Comments on: Esoteric Supreme Court trivia question http://whereswalden.com/2010/05/18/esoteric-supreme-court-trivia-question/ Mozilla, politics, economics, law, backpacking, cycling, and other random desiderata Fri, 27 Apr 2012 03:03:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Preed http://whereswalden.com/2010/05/18/esoteric-supreme-court-trivia-question/comment-page-1/#comment-147662 Preed Thu, 20 May 2010 08:50:39 +0000 http://whereswalden.com/?p=1544#comment-147662 There's a great (non-chain) teppanyaki place there; highly recommended. There’s a great (non-chain) teppanyaki place there; highly recommended.

]]> By: Alex Vincent http://whereswalden.com/2010/05/18/esoteric-supreme-court-trivia-question/comment-page-1/#comment-147622 Alex Vincent Tue, 18 May 2010 20:57:56 +0000 http://whereswalden.com/?p=1544#comment-147622 Okay, you've piqued my interest - that's only a couple miles from where I live, at the intersection of VTA bus routes 61, 62 and 26. Okay, you’ve piqued my interest – that’s only a couple miles from where I live, at the intersection of VTA bus routes 61, 62 and 26.

]]> By: Jeff http://whereswalden.com/2010/05/18/esoteric-supreme-court-trivia-question/comment-page-1/#comment-147608 Jeff Tue, 18 May 2010 17:20:30 +0000 http://whereswalden.com/?p=1544#comment-147608 It actually wasn't much out of the way; a nearby highway disrupts travel enough that "out of the way" isn't much more than one block in one direction, then the same block the opposite direction, for maybe a mile total diversion, four or five minutes of travel plus about the same-ish to take the pictures. And yes, Luis's guess is correct. :-) Dolske's is not. Somewhat strictly speaking. :-P It actually wasn’t much out of the way; a nearby highway disrupts travel enough that “out of the way” isn’t much more than one block in one direction, then the same block the opposite direction, for maybe a mile total diversion, four or five minutes of travel plus about the same-ish to take the pictures.

And yes, Luis’s guess is correct. :-) Dolske’s is not. Somewhat strictly speaking. :-P

]]> By: Justin Dolske http://whereswalden.com/2010/05/18/esoteric-supreme-court-trivia-question/comment-page-1/#comment-147607 Justin Dolske Tue, 18 May 2010 17:19:14 +0000 http://whereswalden.com/?p=1544#comment-147607 [Select to view: <span style="color: white; background: white;">Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping Center, 23 Cal. 3d 899, 910 (1979)?</span>] [Select to view: Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping Center, 23 Cal. 3d 899, 910 (1979)?]

]]> By: Luis http://whereswalden.com/2010/05/18/esoteric-supreme-court-trivia-question/comment-page-1/#comment-147604 Luis Tue, 18 May 2010 16:27:02 +0000 http://whereswalden.com/?p=1544#comment-147604 I've hidden my guess behind <a href="http://ur1.ca/01uj4" rel="nofollow">this shortlink</a> so as not to spoil it for the non-lawyers who comment later :) Tangentially, going out of your way to visit a shopping mall is seriously high-grade legal nerdery. I’ve hidden my guess behind this shortlink so as not to spoil it for the non-lawyers who comment later :)

Tangentially, going out of your way to visit a shopping mall is seriously high-grade legal nerdery.

]]>